Health Profession Opportunity Grants Evaluation, United States, 2010-2016 (ICPSR 37290)
Version Date: May 21, 2019 View help for published
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s)
Abt Associates;
Laura Peck, Abt Associates;
Alan Werner, Abt Associates
Series:
https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37290.v1
Version V1 (see more versions)
You are currently viewing an older version of this data collection. A more recent version may be available by selecting (see more versions)
Alternate Title View help for Alternate Title
Summary View help for Summary
The Health Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG), administered by the Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, was created to provide education and training to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients and other low-income individuals for occupations in the healthcare field that pay well and are expected to either experience labor shortages or be in high demand.
HPOG programs are expected to target skills and competencies demanded by the healthcare industry; support career pathways; result in an employer- or industry-recognized certificate or degree; combine supportive services with education and training services to help participants overcome barriers to employment; and provide services at times and locations that are easily accessible to targeted populations.
In 2010, the first round of HPOG awards was made to 27 organizations located across 20 states to carry out five-year programs in their areas. The first round of HPOG grant awards is referred to as HPOG 1.0. In 2015, a second round of HPOG grant awards was made to 32 organizations located across 21 states for a new five-year period. This second round of grants is referred to as HPOG 2.0.
HPOG is authorized as a demonstration program with a mandated federal evaluation. The Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (OPRE) is utilizing a multi-pronged evaluation strategy to document the operations and assess the success of the HPOG program. The evaluation strategy aims to provide information on program implementation, systems change, outcomes, and impacts.
Citation View help for Citation
Export Citation:
Funding View help for Funding
Subject Terms View help for Subject Terms
Geographic Coverage View help for Geographic Coverage
Distributor(s) View help for Distributor(s)
Time Period(s) View help for Time Period(s)
Date of Collection View help for Date of Collection
Data Collection Notes View help for Data Collection Notes
This collection currently contains only study documentation, including data collection instruments and P.I. produced codebooks. The data will be released at a future date.
See the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (OPRE) website for more details.
See the Career-Pathways website for more details.
Study Purpose View help for Study Purpose
The Health Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG) study's key evaluation questions included:
- What impacts do HPOG programs as a group have on outcomes of participants and their families?
- To what extent do these impacts vary across selected subpopulations?
- Which locally adopted program components influence average impacts?
- To what extent does participation in a particular HPOG component(s) change the impact?
- To what extent do specific program enhancements have impacts, relative to the "standard" HPOG program?
Sample View help for Sample
All participants randomly assigned were included in the Impact Study; All participants were included in the Descriptive Study.
Time Method View help for Time Method
Universe View help for Universe
All participants that enrolled in HPOG are included in the Descriptive Study (N=35,592)
All participants randomly assigned are included in the Impact Study (N=13,716)
Low-income adults
Unit(s) of Observation View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Data Type(s) View help for Data Type(s)
Mode of Data Collection View help for Mode of Data Collection
Response Rates View help for Response Rates
All participants completed the baseline survey. 75.6 percent of the Impact Study sample completed a short-term interview.
Presence of Common Scales View help for Presence of Common Scales
See documentation.
Hide